M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
M&A strategy
Shape M&A strategy from portfolio rationale and target priorities through diligence, value creation and integration.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
Integration is where the deal thesis gets tested
How post-merger operating choices, synergy discipline and organizational readiness determine whether expected transaction value reaches performance.
Read articleFocus
Target screening should begin with acquisition criteria, not company databases
A useful radar translates strategic priorities into observable characteristics that distinguish relevant targets from merely available ones.
A deal thesis should explain why ownership creates more value than any alternative
The logic must connect strategic need, target characteristics, economics and the specific advantage of acquiring rather than building or partnering.
Strategic challenges
What changes when the target sits in another jurisdiction?
The challenge is understanding how regulatory, political and operating differences affect deal structure, execution and integration.
Does the deal remain strategically compelling after the assumptions are challenged?
The challenge is testing acquisition logic independently of valuation, process momentum and management enthusiasm.
POV
Technical debt becomes deal debt when the buyer inherits it without pricing it
Technology quality should be reflected in valuation and integration assumptions, not discovered as an unavoidable cost after close.
Historical growth is evidence, not proof of a durable business model
The relevant question is whether the economic mechanisms behind performance remain credible after the deal closes.
Strategic impact
Independent target intelligence strengthens early acquisition judgment
External evidence on positioning, capabilities and exposure helps buyers decide where deeper diligence is warranted.
Portfolio-led M&A makes acquisition priorities more selective and coherent
Clear strategic gaps and timing criteria help leadership pursue transactions that reinforce portfolio direction rather than distract from it.
What we observe
M&A pipelines often become target lists disconnected from portfolio choices
Deal activity can build momentum around available assets even when the strategic reason to own them remains weak or outdated.
Buy-and-build programs often acquire faster than the platform can integrate
Deal cadence can outrun systems, management capacity and operating-model maturity, leaving value trapped across disconnected assets.