M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
M&A strategy
Shape M&A strategy from portfolio rationale and target priorities through diligence, value creation and integration.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
Due diligence for assets that are changing underneath the deal
Why commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleFocus
Buy-and-build works only when scale creates more than a larger collection of assets
The strategy depends on whether acquisitions can improve economics, capabilities, market position or operating leverage across the platform.
Deal failure usually begins in assumptions made before signing
Strategic overreach, weak diligence, unrealistic synergies and integration constraints often become visible only after commitment is irreversible.
Strategic challenges
Which synergies are real enough to survive integration pressure?
The challenge is distinguishing achievable value from assumptions that depend on perfect execution, double counting or weak causal logic.
Does the deal remain strategically compelling after the assumptions are challenged?
The challenge is testing acquisition logic independently of valuation, process momentum and management enthusiasm.
POV
Most failed deals were not unknowable; they were insufficiently challenged
The discipline is to attack the investment case before the market, integration or balance sheet does it later.
A cross-border deal is never just a domestic deal in another currency
Jurisdiction changes what can be owned, integrated, governed and extracted from the transaction.
Strategic impact
A clear consolidation thesis defines where successive deals can reinforce one another
Explicit scale and capability logic helps buyers distinguish coherent platform building from opportunistic asset accumulation.
A clear deal thesis defines the economic and strategic logic before valuation dominates
Explicit assumptions make it easier to test fit, alternatives and the conditions required for the acquisition to create value.
What we observe
Target assessments often extrapolate recent growth without testing its underlying cause
Strong historical results can conceal customer concentration, weak differentiation or favorable conditions that may not persist.
Companies often jump to acquisition before testing lower-commitment alternatives
Ownership can appear decisive while creating unnecessary capital intensity, integration risk and long-term rigidity.