The rise of the agentic enterprise
How autonomous workflows could reshape decisions, coordination and productivity�and where human oversight remains essential as AI moves from assistance to execution.
Read articleHow ready is the business for the AI it wants?
AI readiness is not a single maturity score. A company may be ready to summarise internal documents and unready to automate a credit, safety or employment decision. Readiness must be judged against a named use case, its operating environment and the damage an error could cause.
Adoption can conceal this gap. The 2026 AI Index reports AI use in 88% of surveyed organisations in 2025, while agent deployment remained in single digits across almost every business function. Separate research found that responsible-AI programmes still faced knowledge gaps at 59% of organisations, budget constraints at 48% and regulatory uncertainty at 41%.
Test five foundations. Value readiness means a measurable outcome and baseline. Process readiness means stable ownership, understood exceptions and a way to redesign work. Data readiness means lawful access, sufficient quality, provenance and current context. Technology readiness means integration, evaluation, observability and fallback. Organisational readiness means skills, adoption incentives and decision rights.
The weakest dependency usually sets the pace. OECD research identifies limited AI skills and data maturity as fundamental barriers; buying a stronger model does not repair either. Use a thin end-to-end pilot to expose missing permissions, unreliable knowledge, manual hand-offs and control costs before committing to scale.
Replace generic readiness workshops with evidence gates: representative data can be accessed; target performance beats the current method; critical failures are bounded; operators can intervene; economics include ongoing controls; and an accountable owner accepts residual risk. Ambition defines where the business wants to go. Readiness is the demonstrated capacity to operate there repeatedly.
Related macro
Articles
How autonomous workflows could reshape decisions, coordination and productivity�and where human oversight remains essential as AI moves from assistance to execution.
Read articleWhat separates companies that scale AI from those that accumulate experiments�and how operating models, economics and governance determine whether adoption creates measurable value.
Read articleFocus
Generic capability becomes useful only when systems can work with the terminology, evidence and constraints that shape domain decisions.
The relevant test is whether AI changes customer value or product capability, not whether another intelligent feature can be added.
Strategic challenges
New capabilities expand what machines can perform, but they do not resolve unnecessary steps, broken handoffs or poor process design.
Models, prompts, data and providers can change independently, creating operational dependencies conventional software practices may miss.
POV
Sovereignty is the ability to retain meaningful control and credible alternatives, not simply the amount of technology operated internally.
Decision systems have greater value when they expose weak assumptions and credible alternatives rather than reinforce the prevailing view.
Strategic impact
Structured deployment, evaluation and monitoring allow teams to change models and configurations without losing visibility or control.
Economic modelling connects AI adoption to specific business drivers and makes the conditions behind expected returns explicit.
What we observe
We often see generic models connected to sector content without encoding the workflows, decision logic and constraints behind expert work.
We often see AI economics assessed after technology choices are made, leaving benefits estimated around investment rather than the reverse.