Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow turnaround strategies can rebuild competitive position by resetting the portfolio, operating priorities and sources of future growth.
Read articleFocus
A strategy becomes meaningful when priorities impose consequences on where capital, leadership attention and capabilities will not be allocated.
A large segment can still be strategically unattractive when acquisition cost, price sensitivity or weak retention undermine its economics.
Strategic challenges
Technology, convergence and new business models increasingly allow competitors from adjacent sectors to enter established value pools.
The consumer proposition must remain attractive while the economics and operating model also work for the franchisee.
POV
A smaller, more productive network can create greater strategic value than ubiquitous availability built on weak economics and limited control.
Cost discipline can create time, but sustainable recovery requires a business that customers still value and that can compete economically.
Strategic impact
Removing structurally weak activities can release the capital and management attention required to rebuild stronger parts of the business.
Milestones matter, but completed activity has limited meaning when the expected operational or economic outcome has not followed.
What we observe
We frequently see consolidated performance obscure businesses that consume capital and attention without a credible path to attractive returns.
We frequently see strategy focused on outperforming incumbents while deeper changes are altering where future profit will be created.