Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow turnaround strategies can rebuild competitive position by resetting the portfolio, operating priorities and sources of future growth.
Read articleFocus
Network growth creates value only when incremental demand, unit economics and strategic coverage justify the capital and complexity added.
Early R&D should create knowledge that changes future choices, not simply advance projects because resources have already been committed.
Strategic challenges
Competitors frequently converge on similar promises because communication evolves faster than the underlying business model or capabilities.
The same person can make very different choices depending on need, context, urgency, channel and willingness to pay.
POV
Defensible positioning must eventually connect to capabilities, economics, assets or choices that are harder to replicate than language.
A company can gain share and still lose economically when rivalry forces pricing, investment or service levels beyond sustainable returns.
Strategic impact
Demanding conventional certainty too early can eliminate important options before the technical and commercial questions are answerable.
Choosing which customers, attributes or economics not to optimise can create a more coherent and defensible basis for advantage.
What we observe
We frequently see strategic importance assigned according to revenue while complexity, concessions and servicing requirements quietly erode value.
We frequently see detailed personas that create little guidance about which customers, occasions or economics should actually be prioritised.