M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
M&A strategy
Shape M&A strategy from portfolio rationale and target priorities through diligence, value creation and integration.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
Due diligence for assets that are changing underneath the deal
Why commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleFocus
Target intelligence looks beyond reported performance to strategic relevance
The objective is to understand ownership, positioning, capabilities, dependencies and the factors that may alter a target's attractiveness.
A deal thesis should explain why ownership creates more value than any alternative
The logic must connect strategic need, target characteristics, economics and the specific advantage of acquiring rather than building or partnering.
Strategic challenges
Does the deal remain strategically compelling after the assumptions are challenged?
The challenge is testing acquisition logic independently of valuation, process momentum and management enthusiasm.
What technology risks are hidden beneath the target's current performance?
The challenge is identifying where architecture, technical debt or cyber exposure may constrain growth or increase post-close investment.
POV
Most failed deals were not unknowable; they were insufficiently challenged
The discipline is to attack the investment case before the market, integration or balance sheet does it later.
Not everything should be integrated just because two companies now share an owner
Integration should follow the deal thesis; combining activities without strategic reason can destroy useful differentiation.
Strategic impact
Cross-border analysis makes jurisdiction-specific deal constraints visible earlier
Testing market access, governance and integration conditions helps buyers assess where geographic complexity changes the thesis.
A clear separation model reduces hidden dependencies before transition begins
Mapping shared services, assets and systems helps define what transfers, what remains and what must be rebuilt.
What we observe
Target lists often become long because acquisition criteria remain vague
Broad screening creates activity but little discrimination when strategic fit is described in generic rather than testable terms.
Strategic diligence often starts too late, after the organization is already committed
Once deal momentum builds, teams can become better at defending the thesis than questioning whether the transaction should happen.