M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleWhy commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleFocus
The objective is to translate deal logic into choices about operating models, systems, people and governance after close.
The issue is how demand, pricing, customers, competition and cost drivers combine to sustain the target's performance.
Strategic challenges
The challenge is proving that acquisition is the best strategic route, not simply the fastest route to a desired capability.
The challenge is identifying hidden constraints that may limit growth, margins, service or integration after ownership changes.
POV
Independent intelligence reduces the risk that the buyer adopts the transaction narrative before forming its own view.
Complex narratives often hide the absence of a clear reason why ownership should improve enterprise value.
Strategic impact
Explicit baselines, owners and dependencies make it easier to track whether integration is producing the economics assumed at signing.
Testing capacity, processes and dependencies helps buyers understand the investment required to sustain or improve performance.
What we observe
Strong historical results can conceal customer concentration, weak differentiation or favorable conditions that may not persist.
A model can appear reasonable while customer retention, pricing power or market-share assumptions remain weakly evidenced.