M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
M&A strategy
Shape M&A strategy from portfolio rationale and target priorities through diligence, value creation and integration.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
Integration is where the deal thesis gets tested
How post-merger operating choices, synergy discipline and organizational readiness determine whether expected transaction value reaches performance.
Read articleFocus
Build, partner or buy is a choice about control, speed and strategic dependence
Different routes create different economics, ownership rights, capability requirements and long-term constraints.
Strategic diligence asks whether the transaction still makes sense under scrutiny
It tests fit, competitive logic, alternatives, downside and whether ownership advances the buyer's broader strategic position.
Strategic challenges
When is ownership actually necessary to achieve the strategic objective?
The challenge is choosing the least restrictive route that still provides the capability, control and economics the business needs.
Where does M&A genuinely improve the portfolio?
The challenge is identifying where acquisition changes strategic position faster or better than organic investment, partnership or exit.
POV
A forecast is not commercially credible because the spreadsheet balances
The revenue case should be supported by observable customer and market behavior, not by internal consistency alone.
A strong income statement can sit on top of a weak operating system
Buyers should understand what must keep working after close, not assume historical performance proves operational resilience.
Strategic impact
Strategic diligence clarifies whether the target strengthens enterprise direction
Testing fit and alternatives helps leadership judge whether the transaction improves strategic position or simply adds another asset.
Portfolio-led M&A makes acquisition priorities more selective and coherent
Clear strategic gaps and timing criteria help leadership pursue transactions that reinforce portfolio direction rather than distract from it.
What we observe
Target assessment often relies too heavily on seller-defined information
Formal materials naturally emphasize strengths, while structural weaknesses, dependencies and strategic constraints may sit outside the process.
Deal teams often catalogue risks without identifying how the transaction actually fails
Long risk registers create limited insight when the few assumptions capable of destroying value are not isolated and tested.