M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleWhy commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleFocus
The objective is to understand ownership, positioning, capabilities, dependencies and the factors that may alter a target's attractiveness.
Cost and revenue assumptions become credible when owners, actions, timing and dependencies are explicit before integration begins.
Strategic challenges
The challenge is separating shared dependencies without disrupting operations or creating an unsustainable standalone cost structure.
The challenge is separating temporary underperformance from assets whose strategic fit, economics or ownership logic has structurally weakened.
POV
Jurisdiction changes what can be owned, integrated, governed and extracted from the transaction.
Good screening should eliminate most companies quickly; selectivity is a sign that strategy is doing its job.
Strategic impact
Sequenced decisions on organization, systems and operations help management protect continuity while building the intended combined model.
Testing demand, competition and value drivers helps buyers understand what performance is structural and what may unwind.
What we observe
Deal activity can build momentum around available assets even when the strategic reason to own them remains weak or outdated.
A long application list adds little unless technical weaknesses are linked to growth, integration, cost or operational risk.