The rise of the agentic enterprise
How autonomous workflows could reshape decisions, coordination and productivity�and where human oversight remains essential as AI moves from assistance to execution.
Read articleRelated macro
AI and autonomous systems
Shape AI and autonomous systems around business priorities, operating models, governance and measurable outcomes.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
From AI pilots to enterprise performance
What separates companies that scale AI from those that accumulate experiments�and how operating models, economics and governance determine whether adoption creates measurable value.
Read articleFocus
Where should AI actually change the business?
The strategic question is not where AI can be used, but where it materially changes competitive position, economics or customer value.
How ready is the business for the AI it wants?
Readiness depends less on ambition than on whether data, processes, governance, skills and operating structures can support specific use cases.
Strategic challenges
AI expands the enterprise attack and failure surface
Models, prompts, tools and autonomous actions introduce pathways that conventional application security may not fully address.
The physical world does not behave like software
Autonomous systems must contend with unpredictable environments, imperfect perception and consequences that cannot simply be rolled back.
POV
An AI feature is not an AI product strategy
Adding intelligence to an existing experience is easy; deciding where AI fundamentally changes the proposition is the harder work.
If AI value cannot be explained, it is not a business case
Claims about transformation mean little without identifiable economic drivers, credible baselines and measurable paths to realised value.
Strategic impact
Good governance can make AI easier to scale
Clear roles, proportional controls and common decision standards reduce ambiguity as AI expands across functions and use cases.
Better decisions begin before the recommendation
Structured AI support can broaden alternatives, expose assumptions and make the reasoning behind consequential choices more explicit.
What we observe
Testing only expected behaviour creates false confidence
We frequently see AI evaluated for quality while adversarial inputs, dependency failures and edge conditions remain largely unexplored.
Governance fails when every use case is treated the same
We often see low-risk and high-impact AI subjected to identical controls, creating friction without improving meaningful oversight.