Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow turnaround strategies can rebuild competitive position by resetting the portfolio, operating priorities and sources of future growth.
Read articleFocus
A large segment can still be strategically unattractive when acquisition cost, price sensitivity or weak retention undermine its economics.
Revenue potential alone says little about attractiveness when bargaining power, acquisition effort, implementation and cost to serve vary materially.
Strategic challenges
Pricing, channels, delivery and cost structure can each appear rational while producing unattractive economics when combined.
Different businesses can pursue distinct markets and economics while remaining aligned around a common corporate direction and contribution.
POV
A large pipeline of experiments is not evidence of innovation strength when the organisation cannot explain which future advantages it is trying to build.
Strong execution cannot preserve advantage indefinitely when the underlying structure determining value capture is moving elsewhere.
Strategic impact
Removing structurally weak activities can release the capital and management attention required to rebuild stronger parts of the business.
Store size, assortment, service model and location type can change capital intensity, customer missions and network economics.
What we observe
We frequently see businesses emphasise differences customers can recognise but have little reason to value or pay for.
We frequently see strategic importance assigned according to revenue while complexity, concessions and servicing requirements quietly erode value.